WEKO3
アイテム
Clarification of the Cause of the Problems in the PIL (Purpose in Life) Test
https://doi.org/10.15112/00005038
https://doi.org/10.15112/000050380e581710-5865-4db3-956c-11a8da98d9c4
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
PDF (265.4 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2010-01-01 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | Clarification of the Cause of the Problems in the PIL (Purpose in Life) Test | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | existence | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | logotherapy | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | meaning_in_life | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | PIL_test | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15112/00005038 | |||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||
| ページ属性 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||||
| 著者名(英) |
Yamamoto, Rena
× Yamamoto, Rena
|
|||||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||||
| en | ||||||||
| Doctoral Program in Social Work, Graduate School of Health and Welfare, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare | ||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||
| en | ||||||||
| The PIL (Purpose in Life) test was devised by psychologist Crumbaugh, J.C. and Maholick, L.T in 1964 and was based on the concept of logotherapy by psychiatrist Frankl, V.E. The test was translated by Fumiko Satou and Hiroko Tanaka in Japan, in 1966. The test was introduced as a `psychological existence test' and is currently used in Japan as psychological evaluation to clarify levels of existence. At the beginning of the study, the test was given to social welfare college students to assess their existential consciousness. I analyzed the test results according to the manual of the test. However, problems were encountered with the test while analyzing the test results. Thus, the purpose of this study is to clarify the cause of the problems in the test. After analyzing and considering the problems, I discovered that since the test uses a natural scientific psychological method of quantitatively evaluating the subject's existence, and that each human's existence differs individually, that the test cannot be evaluated one's existence. In brief, there is a contradiction between the existential philosophical purpose of the test that clarifies existence, and the natural scientific psychological method that evaluates categorically and quantitatively. | ||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
en : Kawasaki journal of medical welfare 巻 15, 号 2, p. 77-86, 発行日 2010 |
|||||||
| 公開者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | 川崎医療福祉学会 | |||||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11108172 | |||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1341-5077 | |||||||
