Item type |
紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) |
公開日 |
2020-06-10 |
タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Examination of the Robustness of the Resilience Scale Using Multigroup Analysis |
|
言語 |
en |
言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
キーワード |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
resilience |
キーワード |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
multigroup analysis |
キーワード |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
robustness |
資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ識別子 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
資源タイプ |
departmental bulletin paper |
ID登録 |
|
|
ID登録 |
10.15112/00014684 |
|
ID登録タイプ |
JaLC |
ページ属性 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
P(論文) |
著者名(英) |
KOIKE, Yasuhiro
ISHIDA, Michiko
IMURA, Wataru
WATANABE, Maki
|
著者所属(英) |
|
|
|
en |
|
|
Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science and Technology, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare |
著者所属(英) |
|
|
|
en |
|
|
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare |
著者所属(英) |
|
|
|
en |
|
|
Department of Occupational Therapy, Tamano Institute of Health and Human Services |
著者所属(英) |
|
|
|
en |
|
|
Department of Occupational Therapy, Tamano Institute of Health and Human Services |
抄録(英) |
|
|
|
en |
|
|
This study aimed to investigate the factor invariance and robustness of a resilience scale using multigroup analysis to allow for a relative comparison of models. Participants were 2568 high school students (male: 1211, female: 1357) in Japan. They answered the questionnaire about their respective general attributes (gender, grade) and the resilience scale. The resilience scale included 9 items and 3 factors (building relationship, overcome power, and breakthrough strength). To investigate whether the resilience scale responds appropriately to the participants in this study, a separate confirmatory factor analysis was conducted for each gender. After examining the construct validity of the resilience scale, a multigroup analysis was conducted for groups by gender. The multigroup analysis confirmed configural invariance, measurement invariance, weak factorial invariance, and strong factorial invariance. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis for each gender was a good fit. Configural invariance was adopted for multigroup analysis. The validity of interpreting resilience in male and female participants using the same model was established in this study. We expect that the current findings will help interpret gender differences in resilience in the field of mental health. |
記事種別(英) |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
Original Paper |
書誌情報 |
en : Kawasaki journal of medical welfare
巻 25,
号 2,
p. 35-41,
発行日 2020
|
公開者 |
|
|
出版者 |
川崎医療福祉学会 |
雑誌書誌ID |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
NCID |
|
収録物識別子 |
AA11108172 |
ISSN |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
PISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
1341-5077 |