{"created":"2025-12-12T02:23:41.315256+00:00","id":2000463,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"09060796-7584-43fd-a012-2cdfcdba0ccb"},"_deposit":{"created_by":20,"id":"2000463","owner":"20","owners":[20],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000463"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kwmw.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000463","sets":["7:1758765761019:1758765942833"]},"author_link":[],"item_1_alternative_title_20":{"attribute_name":"item_1_alternative_title_20","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Commentary on the Tokyo District Court’s March 28, 2013 Judgment on Personal Information Protection Violations: Focusing on the Position of the Judicial Precedent, Corporate Torts, Negligence, and Damages","subitem_alternative_title_language":"en"}]},"item_1_biblio_info_14":{"attribute_name":"bibliographic_information","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2025","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"1","bibliographicPageEnd":"249","bibliographicPageStart":"243","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"35","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"川崎医療福祉学会誌","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_1_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(日)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"橋本, 勇人","creatorNameLang":"ja"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"品川, 佳満","creatorNameLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_1_description_1":{"attribute_name":"item_1_description_1","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"P(論文)","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_description_2":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"症例報告／事例報告","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_full_name_7":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"names":[{"name":"HASHIMOTO, Hayato","nameLang":"en"}]},{"names":[{"name":"SHINAGAWA, Yoshimitsu","nameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"identifier_registration","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15112/0002000463","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_1_publisher_23":{"attribute_name":"item_1_publisher_23","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"川崎医療福祉学会"}]},"item_1_source_id_13":{"attribute_name":"item_1_source_id_13","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10375470","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_1_source_id_19":{"attribute_name":"item_1_source_id_19","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0917-4605","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_1_text_22":{"attribute_name":"item_1_text_22","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"kawasaki medical welfare journal"}]},"item_1_text_9":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"ja","subitem_text_value":"くらしき作陽大学子ども教育学部子ども教育学科"},{"subitem_text_language":"ja","subitem_text_value":"大分県立看護科学大学健康情報科学研究室"}]},"item_1_textarea_11":{"attribute_name":"item_1_textarea_11","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_textarea_language":"ja","subitem_textarea_value":"本研究の目的は，個人情報保護違反に関する東京地裁平成25年3月28日判決を題材に，事例の位置づけ及び法的問題の一端を明らかにすることである．そのため，判例を分析した結果，以下のことが分かった．1）この類型の事件は，筆者らが分析した263件の医療機関の個人情報保護違反の事故から得られたパターンの約33% を占める代表的なものである．2）本件不法行為の法律構成は，民法709条による法人の不法行為責任によっているが，715条の使用者責任による解決も可能である．3）過失については，予見義務違反，結果回避義務違反，予見可能性 + 結果回避義務違反の構成が考えられるが，いずれの考えによっても本件では，過失を認定することができる．4）損害の発生については，パソコンにパスワードが掛けられており個人情報が具体的に漏えいしていないが，その内容が機微な情報の場合には，本人の受忍限度を超え損害を認定することができる．"}]},"item_1_textarea_12":{"attribute_name":"item_1_textarea_12","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_textarea_language":"en","subitem_textarea_value":"The purpose of this study is to clarify the position of the case and some of the legal issues involved, using the March 28, 2013 decision of the Tokyo District Court regarding the violation of personal information protection. As a result of analyzing the precedents, the following findings were obtained. 1) This type of case is representative of about 33% of the pattern obtained from the 263 incidents of personal information protection violations at medical institutions analyzed by the authors. 2) The legal structure of the tort in this case is based on the tort liability of corporations according to Article 709 of the Japanese Civil Code, but it is also possible to settle the case by employer’s liability according to Article 715. 3) Regarding negligence, there are three possible configurations: breach of duty to foresee, breach of duty to avoid the consequences, and foreseeability plus breach of duty to avoid the consequences. 4) Regarding the occurrence of damage, if the personal information was not specifically leaked because the computer was password-protected, but the content of the information is sensitive, the damage may be found to exceed the limit of acceptance by the individual."}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2025-12-12"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"27_橋本勇人.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"695 KB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","url":{"label":"PDF","url":"https://kwmw.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000463/files/27_橋本勇人.pdf"},"version_id":"694ad078-8ef6-437a-afdb-0639780b3da8"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"personal information","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"case law","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"corporate torts","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"negligence","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"damages","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"item_resource_type","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"個人情報保護違反に関する東京地裁平成25年3月28日判決の評釈―判例の位置づけ・法人の不法行為・過失・損害を中心として―","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"個人情報保護違反に関する東京地裁平成25年3月28日判決の評釈―判例の位置づけ・法人の不法行為・過失・損害を中心として―","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"1","owner":"20","path":["1758765942833"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2025-12-12"},"publish_date":"2025-12-12","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000463","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["個人情報保護違反に関する東京地裁平成25年3月28日判決の評釈―判例の位置づけ・法人の不法行為・過失・損害を中心として―"],"weko_creator_id":"20","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2025-12-12T02:31:41.187828+00:00"}